<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Open-Source on Siryu</title><link>https://siryu.me/tags/open-source/</link><description>Recent content in Open-Source on Siryu</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-gb</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2026 15:30:00 +0200</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://siryu.me/tags/open-source/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Euro-Office and LaSuite: European Sovereignty Built on American Ground</title><link>https://siryu.me/posts/euro-office/</link><pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2026 15:30:00 +0200</pubDate><guid>https://siryu.me/posts/euro-office/</guid><description>&lt;p>&lt;img src="https://siryu.me/assets/eurooffice.svg" alt="Cover image">&lt;/p>
&lt;p>A quick follow-up to my &lt;a href="https://siryu.me/posts/usa-lock-in/">previous piece on USA lock-in&lt;/a>. That article ended on a call to action: Europe needs to stop building on American infrastructure, and the smartest path forward is public investment in open-source foundations. Since then, two projects have caught my eye — one federal, one industry-led — and both prove that Europe &lt;em>is&lt;/em> moving, and that the momentum is real. They also, unfortunately, prove that the reflex to build sovereign tools on top of the very platforms we&amp;rsquo;re trying to escape is still with us.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>GitHub's Independence: A Cautionary Tale of Open Source in a Capitalist World</title><link>https://siryu.me/posts/github_independence/</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2025 17:12:29 +0200</pubDate><guid>https://siryu.me/posts/github_independence/</guid><description>&lt;p>&lt;img src="https://siryu.me/assets/github_cetralization.jpg" alt="cover Image">&lt;/p>
&lt;p>The recent departure of &lt;strong>Thomas Dohmke&lt;/strong> from GitHub has created significant discussion within the tech community. As the former CEO, Dohmke was seen by many as a steady hand navigating GitHub&amp;rsquo;s post-acquisition era under Microsoft. His exit has reignited a critical debate that has simmered for years: &lt;strong>Can a single, corporate-controlled platform ever truly serve as the unshakeable foundation for the entire open-source world?&lt;/strong>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>In response, we&amp;rsquo;re seeing familiar calls to action—to migrate to platforms like GitLab or Gitea. While these are great alternatives, they risk repeating the same cycle. The core issue isn&amp;rsquo;t where we go next, but the &lt;strong>fundamental problem of centralization&lt;/strong>. A new &amp;ldquo;Eldorado&amp;rdquo; will emerge, grow in value, get acquired, and inevitably, its licenses and terms of service will change. The real problem isn&amp;rsquo;t GitHub&amp;rsquo;s ownership, but the systemic risk that comes with placing our collective code in a single, vulnerable silo.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>