<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Gitlab on Siryu</title><link>https://siryu.me/tags/gitlab/</link><description>Recent content in Gitlab on Siryu</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-gb</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2025 17:12:29 +0200</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://siryu.me/tags/gitlab/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>GitHub's Independence: A Cautionary Tale of Open Source in a Capitalist World</title><link>https://siryu.me/posts/github_independence/</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2025 17:12:29 +0200</pubDate><guid>https://siryu.me/posts/github_independence/</guid><description>&lt;p>&lt;img src="https://siryu.me/assets/github_cetralization.jpg" alt="cover Image">&lt;/p>
&lt;p>The recent departure of &lt;strong>Thomas Dohmke&lt;/strong> from GitHub has created significant discussion within the tech community. As the former CEO, Dohmke was seen by many as a steady hand navigating GitHub&amp;rsquo;s post-acquisition era under Microsoft. His exit has reignited a critical debate that has simmered for years: &lt;strong>Can a single, corporate-controlled platform ever truly serve as the unshakeable foundation for the entire open-source world?&lt;/strong>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>In response, we&amp;rsquo;re seeing familiar calls to action—to migrate to platforms like GitLab or Gitea. While these are great alternatives, they risk repeating the same cycle. The core issue isn&amp;rsquo;t where we go next, but the &lt;strong>fundamental problem of centralization&lt;/strong>. A new &amp;ldquo;Eldorado&amp;rdquo; will emerge, grow in value, get acquired, and inevitably, its licenses and terms of service will change. The real problem isn&amp;rsquo;t GitHub&amp;rsquo;s ownership, but the systemic risk that comes with placing our collective code in a single, vulnerable silo.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>